西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 106-111.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674 5094.2014.11.24.04
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Shiqian
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The introduction of environmental personality right is the natural result of the development of personality rights and the enhancement of civil and social awareness of the rule of law. Environmental personality right is the content of personality right development,and principles of environmental justice in environmental ethics are the theoretical support for the environmental personality right. The environmental right was explicitly included in the regulations of personality rights in the Civil Code of Ukraine in 1996. United States Supreme Court actually established the environmental personality right through the judgment in the case of“Friends of the Earth,Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC),Inc.”. Worldwide legislation and practice show that it is already a trend to set the environment personality right as a legal right although China has yet to enact the environmental personality right. Environmental personality right is the pursuit of comfortable living environments,and a right that can reflect man’s position as subject in nature and society. The object of environmental personality right is environmental personality benefits,which include day lighting benefits,peace benefits,clean air benefits,clean water benefits,ventilation benefits,natural landscape benefits and other environmental personality benefits.
Key words: personality rights, environmental personality rights, environmental personality benefits, right to health, adjacent right
ZHANG Shiqian. On the Establishment of Environmental Personality Right[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(4): 106-111.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674 5094.2014.11.24.04
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I4/106
[1] 崔卓兰. 生存环境维权指南[M]. 吉林:吉林人民出版社,2004:115 128.[2] 杜志欣. 环境人格权确立的必要性及其制约因素探析[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报,2013(1):28.[3] 吕忠梅. 沟通与协调之途论公民环境权的民法保护[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.[4] [美]布兰代斯. 论隐私权[M]//李丹,译. 哈佛法律评论侵权法学精粹. 北京:法律出版社,2005:3.[5] 蔡秀英. 论环境人格权的民法保护[D]. 青岛:山东科技大学,2008.[6] [美]戴斯 贾丁斯. 环境伦理学[M]. 林官明,杨爱民,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2002:2[7] 晋海. 美国环境正义运动对我国环境法学基础理论研究的启示[J]. 河海大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008(3):25.[8] 徐祥民,陈全书. 中国环境资源法的产生和发展[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:53[9] 蔡磊,胡显伟. 论我国环境法治中的环境正义[J]. 学术探索,2010(6):48.[10] 曹明德,徐以祥. 中国民法法典化与生态保护[J] . 现代法学,2003(4):21.[11] [日]大须贺明. 生存权论[M]. 林浩,译. 北京:法律出版社,2001:194 207.[12] 吕忠梅. 环境法新视野[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.[13] 陈泉生. 环境法原理[M]. 北京:法律出版社,1997:105 109.[14] 徐祥民,田其云. 环境权环境法学的基础研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2004:61.[15] 魏振瀛. 民法:第5 版[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013:261.[16] 张利春. 日本公害侵权中的“容忍限度论”述评兼论对我国民法学研究的启示[J]. 法商研究,2010(3):123.